give directly charity

1. Our full cost-effectiveness model is available here. Midline data were scheduled to be collected from November 2014 to early 2016. One recipient also reported that when it rains, she moves her family and their belongings into other structures to stay dry. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence. The proceeds raised from this event will go directly to helping support our wrap aro. For example, it is partnering with USAID and the World Bank in Liberia, with the UK government's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in Kenya, and with the European Union in Rwanda.36, GiveDirectly has run or is running additional partnership projects with other funders, generally foundations. These amounts generally appear to vary slightly among cohorts of recipients. Past reviews: November 2020 (review), November 2019 (review), November 2018 (review), November 2018 (supplementary information), November 2017 (review), November 2017 (supplementary information), January 2017 (review), January 2017 (supplementary information), November 2016 (prior to . Aspirations study. ), GiveDirectly was previously one of our top charities due to being a GiveWell top charity from 2012 to 2022. We have found very limited information about jealousy and conflict related to other cash transfer programs, but one study that found small levels of hostility towards recipients of an unconditional wealth transfer in Uganda is discussed in our cash transfer intervention report. ) as well as time/labor. In brief, it did not find negative spillover effects of cash transfers. Baseline data collection for the study began in August 2014 and was still in progress as of September 2015. "Based on conversations with policymakers, GiveDirectly has identified gaps in the evidence-base for cash transfers that currently limit policymakers ability to implement cash transfer programs or to do so effectively. [3], In December 2012, GiveDirectly received a $2.4M Global Impact Award from Google. Goal Type: Invest in the capacity of our organization (financial, management, technical, etc.). This is based on data GiveWell reviewed in 2014. In some cases, agents traveled to the villages in which recipients live to reduce recipient travel time." This may include using mobile phone usage data as a proxy predictor of poverty - an approach that we are simultaneously piloting in a rural context in Uganda. Recipients were initially hesitant to come forward. Does distribution to some community members and not others result in jealousy, conflict, or related issues? Between September 2019 and July 2020, GiveDirectly delivered $1.5 million to 2,249 households in the Mugombwa refugee camp, representing 99% of the 2,261 households registered in the camp.31. [12], In Togo it built on an existing government of Togo cash transfer program called Novissi. It also operates a basic income guarantee program, in which recipients receive long-term (over two or twelve years in the initial study), ongoing cash transfers sufficient for basic needs (more). For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the CTHL/TTS investment was valued at $2,563,980 and $387,030, respectively. Call us through our phone lines, send us an email or chat to one of our support representatives to get your questions answered. Cash deployment in the first quarter of 2017 (the period for which we requested data on this metric in 2017) appears to have been quite slow, with 63% of recipients in Kenya and only 9% in Uganda receiving their first payment within 70 days of census. In addition to harming recipients, crime would likely cause delays for GiveDirectly's work. According to the GiveDirectly audit of December 31, 2021 (Note 8, Commitments and Risks, Concentration of Risk): "For the year ended December 31, 2021, GiveDirectly received contributions of approximately $50,000,000 from one donor, which represents 20% of the total . In 2016, we did not ask for a sample. In the Homa Bay region of Kenya, GiveDirectly has encountered high rates of households declining to participate in the program regardless of whether they are eligible. We currently have operations in DRC, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Morocco, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda, USA, & Yemen. We encourage readers who find formal cost-effectiveness analysis important to examine the details of our calculations and assumptions, and to try putting in their own values. In this situation, we deduct 7 points from the charity's Accountability and Transparency score. 3. [5][6][7] In August 2015, GiveDirectly received a $25M grant from Good Ventures. The IRS is significantly delayed in processing nonprofits' annual tax filings (Forms 990). GiveDirectly has told us that recipients are generally able to withdraw cash from mobile money agents located in or near their villages.71 In 2015 and 2016, we spot-checked the data GiveDirectly shared with us. When GiveDirectly first started its "distributed cash out" model in Uganda (instead of hosting "cash out days" GiveDirectly conducted some quick follow-up phone calls with vulnerable recipients in Uganda; in the sample of 67 call records GiveDirectly sent us, only 9 vulnerable recipients had already withdrawn their funds successfully (although many had received the transfer and were planning to withdraw it soon, and 22 responses were ambiguous). It excludes costs of following up with households who have received transfers recently (and so who have not yet been followed up with). During 2021 and 2020,GiveDirectly received$3,711,527 and $2,770,916, respectivelyfromGiveDirectly UK. The charitable deduction is limited to 30% of income, but excess deductions may be carried forward for up to five years. declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Based on conversations with policymakers, GiveDirectly found that a key question relevant to government cash transfer programs is the impact they have on macroeconomic factors such as inflation and job creation.12 With additional funding, it could significantly increase the number of cash transfers it delivers in six countries and potentially expand to additional countries. How is your organization collecting feedback from the people you serve? Paul Niehaus, GiveDirectly's President, is serving as one of the Principal Investigators on this study, along with Edward Miguel (UC Berkeley), Johannes Haushofer (Princeton), and Michael Walker (UC Berkeley). Poverty rate is higher than in Rarieda (50% vs 46%)"GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, February 2016, Pg 13, See details in row "Aspirations study" of this spreadsheet. These projects would mostly take place in countries GiveDirectly has not worked in before. This can be achieved while setting a high benchmark for efficiency. givedirectly .org. A "helper" is someone who is not registered for the payments, but who helps the recipient with the process (e.g. Email Me. The one-off nature of transfers (recipients are not eligible for a second round of transfers) may help to mitigate these effects among past and current recipients. In partnership with Google.org, GiveDirectly has a disaster relief fund and a digital tool with the goal of being able to respond to a US-based natural disaster within 72 hours. GiveDirectly is leading the world's largest and longest term experiment to date studying the effects of a Universal Basic Income. Approximately $150 million to maintain its rolling cash transfer programs in DRC, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Uganda in 2021-23. Based on conversations in 2017, our understanding is that GiveDirectly's main locations of operation did not change in 2017. The difference between a charity's three-year budget and the funding we project that it will have available to support that budget is the charity's room for more funding. While we believe that this is a reasonable estimate of the percentage of funds that will reach recipient households in the future, it is an imperfect estimate in a few ways: A breakdown of GiveDirectly's spending from August 2016 to February 2018 is in GiveWell's analysis of GiveDirectly financial summary through February 2018. and include answers to such questions as:64, Based on the responses we have seen, we believe that the survey respondents are very poor. [22], After the release of GiveDirectly's impact self-evaluation in October 2013,[23] World Bank economist David McKenzie praised the robustness of the study's design and the clear disclosure of the study lead's conflict of interest, but raised two concerns:[24], Chris Blattman, an academic in development economics, with a particular focus on randomized controlled trials, also blogged about the study. No Credit: The charity did not have its audited financials prepared by an independent accountant. US: +1 646 504 4837; Kenya: +254 704 372011; Uganda: +256 783 705 444. We remain highly uncertain of our ability to determine how much these activities sway policymakers' or funders' decisions, even if we put substantial time and effort into the question. "By now, GiveDirectly understands well the process for seeking government approvals in Kenya and does not see acquiring approvals as a major risk." In short, we find GiveDirectly's approach to be defensible, but we look forward to seeing the results of GiveDirectly's experimentation with different approaches in the future. "The GE study finds that cash transfers had large positive spillovers on non-recipient households and enterprises, and minimal price inflation on the local economy." We have not seen data from Uganda because GiveDirectly only began formally tracking call center data in Uganda in December 2017. See this spreadsheet, sheet "Available and expected funding," row Committed to future activities., See this spreadsheet, sheet "Funding commitments," rows Committed to households, and Planned cash transfer program spending in 2020., See this spreadsheet, sheet "Funding commitments," rows Planned special projects spending in 2021 and later, "Planned fundraising spending," and Held for partnership matching opportunities., See this spreadsheet, sheet Available and expected funding.. People under a humanitarian crisis as a result of a natural disaster also benefit from our charity. We emphasize that our conclusion at this point is very tentative, and we hope to update our views next year if there is more public discussion or research on the areas of uncertainty highlighted in our analysis. Under both models, villages are selected primarily based on local poverty levels, though other factors, such as security, population density, accessibility, and the presence of other NGOs in the area, are also considered.43 Anecdotal evidence from our site visit to GiveDirectly's program in Kenya in 2012 is consistent with the idea that a large portion of households in villages targeted by GiveDirectly are very poor (more detail in footnote).47. The leading question that came out of these conversations was about the macroeconomic impacts, or general equilibrium effects, of cash transfers when conducted at a national scale. ", "On July 15, 2016, the PPI moved from Grameen Foundation as its organizational home to Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA). These celebrities are not just talented and successful, but they're also passionate about giving back to their communities. We use qualitative assessments of our top charities to inform our funding recommendations. How does GiveDirectly discover these instances? GiveDirectly, comments on a draft of this page, October 2020 (unpublished). He estimated that people affected by this issue would receive their first installment of funds in another 2-3 weeks. However, the Chairman for 2020 and the first seven months of 2021 and co-founder ofGiveDirectly is one of several members of the Board of Directors ofGiveDirectly UK. Have you heard complaints about GiveDirectly in your community? Data from Kenya and Uganda for 2013-2015 are on our page with additional information about GiveDirectly. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020,GiveDirectly maintained approximately $22,589,000 and $22,400,000, in accounts at non-U.S. financial institutions.". We consider the overall risk to be low, in large part because we'd guess that the following factors might slow GiveDirectly's ability to transfer funds, but that in most scenarios funds would simply reach households somewhat later. We have examined data collected by GiveDirectly from its enrollment process (registration, remote checks, and audits) for most transfer campaigns through 2014. Were also supporting local communities hosting these refugees, the majority of whom are themselves living in extreme poverty. More on GiveDirectly's staff structure can be found on our page with additional information about GiveDirectly. We are among the fastest-growing international development non-profits and are recipients of a Google Global Impact Award and a top rating from GiveWell. (More). The funds were stolen "primarily through staff enrolling ineligible households with the expectation of receiving part of their transfers. The following details relate to data from the second half of 2017. The following table shows GiveDirectly's committed cash transfers by country and program in 2019. I am optimistic that this time around, she will notice an improvement in her performance." info@givedirectly.org. We check the charity's last two Forms 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets. While this is plausible, we do not see any clear way to verify the suggested causal connection. The study is randomized at the village level, will involve 325 villages, and is expected to survey approximately 3,900 households and 4,875 enterprises. In response, GiveDirectly has been more proactive in coordinating with the mobile money service for the transfers that have begun, for example, by giving the mobile money service advanced notice before sending the funds so that agents could be prepared. In short: In sum, we estimate that GiveDirectly could use over $350 million, beyond the funding we expect it to receive, to maintain and expand its cash transfer programs in 2021-23. It plans to evaluate its impact through an RCT,27 GiveDirectly has also presented some limited data on spending in a single village on its website.101 In 2021, GiveDirectly stopped using the technology platform services provided by Segovia. In 2019, Segovia was acquired by Crown Agents Bank.4 One of the aims of GiveDirectly's partnership and evaluation work is to influence the broader international aid sector to use its funding more cost-effectively.145 These findings inform the design of a study we are launching in 2023 with academics from the University of Minnesota, Northwestern University, and UT Austin. There are several ways in which these programs could be more or less cost-effective than GiveDirectly's standard cash transfers: Possibility (3) is likely the most important for cost-effectiveness, as the institutional funders GiveDirectly is in conversations with control very large amounts of funding, and even a fairly small possibility of a modest percentage change in how much these funders allocate to cash transfers would imply that partnership projects are highly cost-effective. The next three largest categories of spending were on other home improvements, livestock, and furniture.103. The people who handled the cash that was meant to help charity beneficiaries were the same ones misusing the funds. This charity's score is 91%, earning it a Four-Star rating. The RCT of GiveDirectly's program in Rarieda did not find an increase in spending on alcohol or tobacco. We gathered feedback directly from almost every recipient in 2021. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting, Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website, Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website. Moved the GiveDirectly call center (hotline) to Kampala, to increase the separation of call center staff from field staff, who are based in Mbale. Studies generally show substantial increases in short-term consumption. In follow-up surveys from the second half of 2017, recipients were asked about their experience with customer service and 2.7% reported receiving no customer service after trying.117. A worsening cycle of storms and drought is threatening safety and food supply for many in southern Africa. @GiveDirectly, Rarieda Top-up verification (short)@. Free delivery for many products! Is this becoming a more common problem? GiveDirectly provides unconditional cash transfers using cell phone technology to some of the world's poorest people, as well as refugees, urban youth, and disaster victims. SUMMARY In order to offer Muslim donors a way to give their annual religious tithing (zakat) to an EA-aligned intervention, GiveDirectly launched a zakat-compliant fund, delivered as cash to Yemeni f This search returns results from both GiveWell's main site and from the GiveWell Blog. Very few people were censused for the standard program in Kenya during that time period. In 2017 and 2018, we requested only summary data on key metrics, rather than household-level data. In partnership with UNICEF and the Kampala City Council Authority, GiveDirectly is distributing cash transfers as part of the Girls Empowering Girls program, which also includes a mentorship and peer education component delivered by local youth NGOs. Money is paid via mobile money technology, with beneficiaries withdrawing money at local shops. Original RCT in Rarieda, Kenya. If GiveDirectly were to start working in more urban areas, where crime rates tend to be higher, GiveDirectly would put more time into strategizing about crime and security. GiveDirectly notes that it was not involved in the fundraising or spending for this research study, though it did incur costs due to coordinating with researchers. You can enable families to meet their own needs and begin to recover. We believe potential negative spillover effects of GiveDirectlys program are likely to be minimal on net for a number of reasons, including: the largest and highest quality study (the GE study) found no evidence of negative spillovers, and we have not seen strong evidence on the mechanisms for large negative spillover effects. Additional sources: "The GE [general equilibrium] study finds that cash transfers had large positive spillovers on non-recipient households and enterprises, and minimal price inflation on the local economy." "We were able to identify something was wrong earlier in the process in this case -- between the research mapping stage and our census, which allowed us to respond/investigate earlier. The vast majority of Open Philanthropy's current giving comes from Good Ventures. As we have relayed previously we have tried to hedge against this by improving governmental contacts. With the needs of our children growing in these unprecedented times, this drive is as important as ever. See row "General equilibrium study" in this spreadsheet. GiveDirectly believes there has been an increase in the number of studies that include cash arms (and GiveDirectly was invited to implement the cash arms of several new evaluations). GiveDirectly believes people living in poverty deserve the dignity to choose for themselves how best to improve their lives cash enables that choice. page with additional, detailed information on GiveDirectly, our page with additional information about GiveDirectly, publicly provided the plan for collecting and analyzing data, a report on the results of the pilot study, this intervention faces an unusually low burden of proof, site visit to GiveDirectly's program in Kenya in 2012, page with additional information about GiveDirectly, RCT of GiveDirectly's program in Rarieda and the broader literature on cash transfers, 2012 discussion of the cost-effectiveness of cash transfers and other interventions, Carolina Toth, conversation with GiveWell, November 12, 2015, Carolina Toth, email to GiveWell, November 10, 2015, Carolina Toth, email to GiveWell, October 20, 2015, Center for Global Development blog post, April 2018, Conversation with Carolina Toth, GiveDirectly, November 20, 2014, Conversation with GiveDirectly, April 8, 2014, Conversation with GiveDirectly, December 7, 2013, Conversation with GiveDirectly, July 7, 2014, Conversation with Paul Niehaus, President, and Joy Sun, COO, Domestic, GiveDirectly, July 18, 2013, Conversation with Paul Niehaus, President, and Joy Sun, COO, Domestic, GiveDirectly, July 18, 2013 (unpublished), Conversation with Piali Mukhopadhyay, GiveDirectly, October 20-21, 2014, Conversation with Piali Mukhopadhyay, GiveDirectly, October 20-21, 2014 (unpublished), Conversation with Stuart Skeates, GiveDirectly, October 20-21, 2014 (unpublished), Crown Agents Bank, Crown Agents Bank acquires Segovia to strengthen its frontier markets payment platform, 2019, Dylan Matthews, Vox article, April 15, 2016, Email from Joe Huston, GiveDirectly, April 20, 2018, Email from Paul Niehaus, President, GiveDirectly, and Joy Sun, COO, Domestic, GiveDirectly, November 18, 2013, GiveDirectly blog, Fighting fraud in Uganda, GiveDirectly census data, standard Rwanda, July-November 2017, GiveDirectly Disbursement figures for 2018 and targets for 2019, GiveDirectly financial summary through February 2018, GiveDirectly financial summary through July 2017, GiveDirectly staff, responses to monitoring questions, October 11, 2016, GiveDirectly, "Respond to COVID-19 in Africa," 2020, GiveDirectly, 2019 disbursement figures and 2020 targets, GiveDirectly, Blog post, "Announcing cash for refugees," March 27, 2018, GiveDirectly, Blog post, "How facial identification technology could help our field ops," April 4, 2019, GiveDirectly, Blog post, "How participants opt in to GDLive," November 17, 2016, GiveDirectly, Blog post, "Our take on HS18, revisited," April 20, 2018, GiveDirectly, Blog post, September 22, 2016, GiveDirectly, Blog post, September 5, 2016, GiveDirectly, Check in with GiveWell, September 2014, GiveDirectly, Contextualizing transfer size, GiveDirectly, Dashboard Metrics for GiveWell, August 2017, GiveDirectly, Distributed cash out follow up with vulnerable recipients, GiveDirectly, email newsletter, August 15, 2017, GiveDirectly, email newsletter, December 27, 2016, GiveDirectly, Enrollment speed of distributions - Siaya and Rarieda, GiveDirectly, Final report Nike girls study, GiveDirectly, Follow-up tracker, July 2013, GiveDirectly, Follow-up tracker, October 2014, GiveDirectly, GE research and measurement plan, GiveDirectly, Google follow-up data - disaggregated (LS - long), GiveDirectly, Google transfer schedule, July 2013, GiveDirectly, Google verification, September 2013, GiveDirectly, Kenya 1.2M enrollment database, GiveDirectly, Kenya 2M census results, July 2013, GiveDirectly, Kenya 2M enrollment database, September 2013, GiveDirectly, Kenya follow up data, November 2014, GiveDirectly, Kenya hotline log, July 2013, GiveDirectly, Kenya randomized sample of adverse events, 2014-2015, GiveDirectly, Kenya rolling campaign enrollment database - Homa Bay, GiveDirectly, Kenya rolling campaign enrollment database - Siaya, GiveDirectly, Kenya top 10 adverse events 2015, GiveDirectly, Kenya verification template, August 2013, GiveDirectly, Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda enrollment database, 2016, GiveDirectly, Monthly operations report, August 2015, GiveDirectly, Monthly operations report, February 2016, GiveDirectly, Monthly operations report, October 2014, GiveDirectly, Nike follow-up data - disaggregated, GiveDirectly, Nike verification (combined), May 2013, GiveDirectly, Nike verification (final), September 2013, GiveDirectly, Nike verification (short version), June 2013, GiveDirectly, Offering Memorandum (January 2012), GiveDirectly, Operational process overview, GiveDirectly, Performance - Quality of Service, September 2016, GiveDirectly, Rarieda Top-up Verification (short), GiveDirectly, Rarieda verification (top ups), May 26, 2013, GiveDirectly, Refugee pilot study results, GiveDirectly, Room for funding update for GiveWell, October 2016, GiveDirectly, Siaya follow-up data - disaggregated, GiveDirectly, Siaya poverty data by location, GiveDirectly, Siaya verification, June 15, 2013, GiveDirectly, Survey for randomized controlled trial, GiveDirectly, UBI cost-effectiveness estimate, GiveDirectly, Uganda 2M campaign enrollment database, GiveDirectly, Uganda pilot enrollment database - Akumure, GiveDirectly, Uganda pilot enrollment database - Kanyamutamu, GiveDirectly, Uganda pilot enrollment database - Kawo, GiveDirectly, Uganda pilot enrollment database - Kosile, GiveDirectly, Uganda pilot follow up data, April 2014, GiveDirectly, Uganda randomized sample of adverse events, 2014-2015, GiveDirectly, Uganda targeting data, July 22, 2013, GiveDirectly, Uganda top 10 adverse events 2015, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell on experimentation, September 2016, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, April 2014, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, February 2015, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, February 2016, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, July 2013, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, July 2014, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, May 2015, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, October 2014, GiveDirectly, Update for GiveWell, September 2015, GiveDirectly, Update on process changes, August 28, 2013, GiveDirectly, Updated data (March 31, 2012), GiveDirectly, Verification data (November 17, 2011), GiveDirectly, Verification template (November 7, 2011), GiveDirectly, Verification template (October 1, 2012), GiveDirectly, Village selection process Kenya, GiveDirectly, Village targeting regression, GiveDirectly, What We Do - Operating Model, GiveDirectly, What We Do - Operating Model, October 2016, GiveWell site visit to GiveDirectly, October 2014, GiveWell, GiveDirectly financials - May 2016, GiveWell, GiveDirectly follow up surveys summary - Kenya, September 2015, GiveWell, GiveDirectly follow up surveys summary - Uganda, September 2015, GiveWell, Room for more funding analysis for GiveDirectly, 2020, GiveWell, spot checks of Segovia follow-up data sample, 2016, GiveWell, spot checks of Segovia registration sample 2016, GiveWell, Summary of GiveDirectly's experimentation work, 2020, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Carolina Toth, GiveDirectly, October 1, 2014, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Ian Bassin and Piali Mukhopadhyay, GiveDirectly, August 23, 2016, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Matt Johnson and Paul Niehaus, June 28, 2017, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Paul Niehaus and Carolina Toth, September 7, 2015, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Paul Niehaus, Carolina Toth, and Ian Bassin, August 12, 2016, GiveWell's non-verbatim summary of a conversation with Paul Niehaus, Carolina Toth, and Ian Bassin, February 23, 2016, Ground Truth Solutions, Survey of affected people and field staff in GiveDirectly's refugee program in Uganda, January 2018, Ian Bassin and Piali Mukhopadhyay, conversation with GiveWell, August 23, 2016, Ian Bassin, COO, Domestic, GiveDirectly, email to GiveWell, August 25, 2016, Ian Bassin, edits to GiveWell's review, November 10, 2016, IGIHE, "Ubudehe undergoes reforms, poverty numbers worrying," April 2016, Innovations for Poverty Action, Benchmarking a WASH and nutrition program to cash in Rwanda, Innovations for Poverty Action, The impact of unconditional cash transfers on general welfare in Kenya, Jean Junior, The Perspectives of Young Women in Siaya County, Kenya: Their Lives and Their Thoughts on Cash Transfer Programs, Johannes Haushofer and Jeremy Shapiro, Welfare Effects of Unconditional Cash Transfers: Pre-Analysis Plan, June 27, 2013, Johannes Haushofer and Paul Niehaus, DIL Demonstration Proposal, Lydia Tala, GiveDirectly Field Assistant, conversation with GiveWell, November 7, 2012, Michael Faye and Paul Niehaus, Slate article, April 14, 2016, Paul Niehaus and Carolina Toth, conversation with GiveWell, May 28, 2015, Paul Niehaus and Ian Bassin, conversation with Givewell, September 15, 2016, Paul Niehaus and Johannes Haushofer, Optimizing Impact for the Mobile Era - Final Report, Paul Niehaus, AMA on Reddit, May 31, 2016, Paul Niehaus, Carolina Toth, and Ian bassin, conversation with GiveWell, August 12, 2016, Paul Niehaus, GiveDirectly Founder, conversation with GiveWell, October 22 2012, Paul Niehaus, GiveDirectly Founder, email to GiveWell, November 20, 2012, Piali Mukhopadhyay, COO, International, GiveDirectly, conversation with GiveWell, November 8, 2012, Piali Mukhopadhyay, COO, International, GiveDirectly, email to GiveWell, November 23, 2012, UCSD, Policy Design and Evaluation Lab, "Tracking the Impact of GiveDirectly Transfers with Mobile Surveys in Kenya", XE currency converter, Kenya shillings to US dollars, September 25, 2015, XE currency converter, Uganda shillings to US dollars, September 25, 2015, previous versions of our review of GiveDirectly, Why were excited to fund charities work a few years in the future, Two partnership projects (one with USAID), Cash transfer programs offer an evidence-backed opportunity to improve peoples lives very directly.